Crosswords Sudoku and Comics
Science

Australia Bans Under-16s from Social Media as Researchers Urge Alternative Approach

Experts from NYU's Center for Business and Human Rights argue that targeted design restrictions should be tried before age bans are imposed.

We are thrilled to invite you to join us next Wednesday, June 28th, 10-11am Pacific time for a brown bag conversation with Panthea Lee, Principal of Reboot. We have partnered with Panthea and her team for the movement strategy research project in Indonesia and Brazil. Prior to that, Reboot has been
We are thrilled to invite you to join us next Wed…      Teenager Smartphone Social Media    BCampbell (WMF) / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 3.0)
By Free News Press Editorial Team
Published August 13, 2026 at 1:33 PM PDT

Australia has banned anyone under 16 from creating social media accounts, and similar minimum-age proposals are gaining ground in other countries. A pair of researchers say policymakers are moving too fast.

According to Live Science, the debate is being addressed by Jonathan Bellack, a former senior product leader in ads and online safety at Google, and Mariana Olaizola Rosenblat, a policy advisor on technology and law at the New York University Stern Center for Business and Human Rights. Both are also parents.

Supporters of age bans point to studies on the harms of youth social media use and argue that the threat of restrictions has already pushed some companies to make their products safer. Critics of bans argue that requiring adults to submit to age verification creates privacy harms and security risks. They also argue that blocking young people from these platforms infringes on their right to participate in public life and can push them toward riskier alternatives such as Telegram.

Bellack and Rosenblat say they recognize that minimum-age requirements will continue to advance if platforms fail to comply with targeted design requirements. Before policymakers move to full bans, they argue, two other approaches deserve serious consideration.

The first involves enforcing targeted, proportionate restrictions. Human rights law offers a methodology for evaluating government actions that restrict individual rights: Does the restriction achieve its purpose, or could a lesser restriction accomplish the same result? Applied to social media, a government would need to show that switching off or altering harmful platform features, or expanding parental controls, would not be enough before removing children from a service entirely.

The argument draws on the principle that the least intrusive effective measure should be tried first. Rosenblat's work focuses on governance of online gaming, social media, encrypted messaging, and immersive technologies. Bellack spent 15 years as a senior product leader at Google and was the founding director of the Applied Social Media Lab at Harvard's Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society.

Both researchers write from what they describe as professional experience alongside personal stakes, noting that the outcome of this policy debate will affect their own families directly. The push for age restrictions, they argue, is not slowing down, which makes it more important to establish whether less sweeping interventions can work first.

35 pages : 28 cm
"In these pages, you will see how Bureau of Land Management (BLM) employees continued to expand excellent community partnerships via education, interpretation, partnerships, stewardship, volunteers, and youth programs throughout 2017--Page 1
Cover title
"BLM/WO/GI-18/008+1115."
"...
35 pages : 28 cm "In these pages, you will see ho…      Teenager Smartphone Social Media    United States. Bureau of Land Management / Wikimedia Commons (Public domain)