Crosswords Sudoku and Comics
Science

New Study Finds First Complex Cells Drew Genes From Multiple Bacterial Sources

Researchers examining genes shared by all eukaryotes concluded that multiple separate waves of bacterial gene transfers shaped early complex cell evolution, not just a single merger event.

Diagram of DNA in a eukaryotic cell
Diagram of DNA in a eukaryotic cell      Eukaryote Cell Diagram    Radio89 / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)
By Free News Press Editorial Team
Published June 11, 2026 at 1:30 PM PDT

The story of how complex life began has long been told as a merger: one archaeal cell absorbed a bacterium, that bacterium became the mitochondria, and the resulting hybrid eventually gave rise to every plant, animal, fungus, and protozoan on Earth. A new study suggests that story is correct, but far from complete.

According to a report by Ars Technica, researchers took a careful look at genes shared by all eukaryotes and found evidence of several separate waves of gene transfers from bacteria, not a single founding event. The broad outline of an archaeal-bacterial merger still holds, but the new findings place that merger inside a much busier environment where genes were routinely moving between species.

Eukaryotes are the domain of life that includes all complex cells, meaning cells with a nucleus and internal structures. Humans, along with every other animal, are built from them. Bacteria and archaea, by contrast, are simpler cells that lack a nucleus and were for a long time considered two versions of the same thing. It was not until relatively recently that scientists recognized archaea as a fully distinct lineage of life.

The idea that mitochondria descended from bacteria living inside a host cell was itself controversial when it was first proposed. The scientist who championed the idea was dismissed for years before her argument became widely accepted. After that acceptance, she extended the argument further, suggesting that every complex internal structure inside eukaryotic cells had come about through similar processes of one cell taking up residence inside another. That broader claim has not found supporting evidence.

What the new study adds is a more detailed picture of the bacterial contribution to the eukaryotic genome. Rather than most bacterial genes arriving in a single event tied to the mitochondrial ancestor, the research points to multiple independent transfers from different bacterial sources. That means the earliest eukaryotes were not simply the product of two lineages fusing, but were instead shaped by repeated genetic exchanges happening across a microbial world where gene sharing was common.

The findings complicate the clean version of eukaryotic origin stories without overturning the core framework. Mitochondria still trace back to a bacterial ancestor. The nucleus still carries a mixture of archaeal and bacterial genes. But the bacterial portion of that mixture appears to have arrived through more than one route and from more than one source.

For researchers studying the origins of complex life, the results suggest that early eukaryotic evolution was messier and more interconnected with the broader microbial world than the simple two-parent merger model implied. Gene transfer between distantly related microbes was not an exception in early life but a routine part of how genomes were built.

Diagram of DNA in a eukaryotic cell
Diagram of DNA in a eukaryotic cell      Eukaryote Cell Diagram    User:Tiger66, User:Cwbm (commons), Sponk, Tryphon, Magnus Manske, User:Dietzel65, LadyofHats (Mariana Ruiz), Radio89 / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)